<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: William Lane Craig vs. Francisco J. Ayala &#8211; Is Intelligent Design Viable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/william-lane-craig-vs-francisco-j-ayala-is-intelligent-design-viable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/william-lane-craig-vs-francisco-j-ayala-is-intelligent-design-viable/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dawkins’ The Greatest Show on Earth Shies Away from Intelligent Design but Unwittingly Vindicates Michael Behe : Christian News New Zealand</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/william-lane-craig-vs-francisco-j-ayala-is-intelligent-design-viable/comment-page-1/#comment-63641</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dawkins’ The Greatest Show on Earth Shies Away from Intelligent Design but Unwittingly Vindicates Michael Behe : Christian News New Zealand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2225#comment-63641</guid>
		<description>[...] PS. Well done to Francis Ayala who has the guts to step up to the plate and debate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PS. Well done to Francis Ayala who has the guts to step up to the plate and debate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: christiannews.co.nz @ 2012-02-09 03:14:34 -->
