<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Dawkins’ The Greatest Show on Earth Shies Away from Intelligent Design but Unwittingly Vindicates Michael Behe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Phipps</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-64793</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-64793</guid>
		<description>Why are there zero mentions of &quot;leading&quot; ID proponents? They aren&#039;t important. that&#039;s why. This is a science book first and foremost. Dawkins has no obligation to delve into ID thinking because the book isn&#039;t about that. ID, just like pure creationism is not science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are there zero mentions of &#8220;leading&#8221; ID proponents? They aren&#8217;t important. that&#8217;s why. This is a science book first and foremost. Dawkins has no obligation to delve into ID thinking because the book isn&#8217;t about that. ID, just like pure creationism is not science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Wiseau</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-63588</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Wiseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-63588</guid>
		<description>Cool, whats your address - I&#039;ll send you the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, whats your address &#8211; I&#8217;ll send you the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-63453</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 07:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-63453</guid>
		<description>Good 4 u Tommy. But show me the evidence. Anything.  I refuse to believe anything unless I have sufficient evidence!!!

Help me Tommy -- I&#039;m sounding like Dawkins.

But seriously, the fact this argument is being used by Dawkins shows the level he is prepared to stoop to.  Does he REALLY think that there is as much evidence for such fanciful beasts as there is for God?  How silly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good 4 u Tommy. But show me the evidence. Anything.  I refuse to believe anything unless I have sufficient evidence!!!</p>
<p>Help me Tommy &#8212; I&#8217;m sounding like Dawkins.</p>
<p>But seriously, the fact this argument is being used by Dawkins shows the level he is prepared to stoop to.  Does he REALLY think that there is as much evidence for such fanciful beasts as there is for God?  How silly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Wiseau</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-63429</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Wiseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-63429</guid>
		<description>I believe in unicorns and lepricorns, I read about them once in a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in unicorns and lepricorns, I read about them once in a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-62772</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-62772</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and Dawkins is a model of objectivity, right? Oh that&#039;s right, I am either ignorant, stupid, or perhaps even wicked, but I doubt Dawkins would put that in writing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and Dawkins is a model of objectivity, right? Oh that&#8217;s right, I am either ignorant, stupid, or perhaps even wicked, but I doubt Dawkins would put that in writing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-62749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-62749</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t help but thinking that is a hugely biased and unbalanced review from someone with a religious agenda, go figure :P Listen to Dawkins, he is the voice of reasonable and rational thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t help but thinking that is a hugely biased and unbalanced review from someone with a religious agenda, go figure <img src='http://christiannews.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Listen to Dawkins, he is the voice of reasonable and rational thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KFC, My Illness, and Me! &#124; iamjonnyking.com</title>
		<link>http://christiannews.co.nz/2009/richard-dawkins%e2%80%99-the-greatest-show-on-earth-shies-away-from-intelligent-design-but-unwittingly-vindicates-michael-behe/comment-page-1/#comment-62049</link>
		<dc:creator>KFC, My Illness, and Me! &#124; iamjonnyking.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiannews.co.nz/?p=2162#comment-62049</guid>
		<description>[...] MMmmmm, Okay, so that was a slightly idolatrous thought, as a possibly-good-thing, ventured dangerously near being an ultimate thing, but of all the not-so-Fast food options, trying to get around-our-real-name-of Kentucky Fried Chicken would have to rank as my favourite&#8230; at least its better for you than Dawkins Fried Chicken! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MMmmmm, Okay, so that was a slightly idolatrous thought, as a possibly-good-thing, ventured dangerously near being an ultimate thing, but of all the not-so-Fast food options, trying to get around-our-real-name-of Kentucky Fried Chicken would have to rank as my favourite&#8230; at least its better for you than Dawkins Fried Chicken! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
