Comments on: "William Lane Craig wins on points, and substance" http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/ Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:10:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Dale Campbell http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/comment-page-1/#comment-7039 Dale Campbell Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:32:11 +0000 http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/#comment-7039 Damian (himself an atheist) and I went together to the debate, and he also was disappointed at Cooke's lack of engagement... http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/06/18/bill-cooke-vs-william-lane-craig/ Damian (himself an atheist) and I went together to the debate, and he also was disappointed at Cooke’s lack of engagement…

http://damian.peterson.net.nz/2008/06/18/bill-cooke-vs-william-lane-craig/

]]> By: Dale Campbell http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/comment-page-1/#comment-7038 Dale Campbell Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:25:55 +0000 http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/#comment-7038 Though I'm not sure the language of 'winning' is helpful, I do agree with what I'd say is a general impression (even from atheists) that Cooke didn't fully (or at all?) engage with Craig. Paradoxically, Cooke's failure (unwillingness?) to engage with Craig's points caused the would-be debate to become precisely the 'he said, she said' banter he was supposedly trying to avoid... Though I’m not sure the language of ‘winning’ is helpful, I do agree with what I’d say is a general impression (even from atheists) that Cooke didn’t fully (or at all?) engage with Craig.

Paradoxically, Cooke’s failure (unwillingness?) to engage with Craig’s points caused the would-be debate to become precisely the ‘he said, she said’ banter he was supposedly trying to avoid…

]]> By: ChristianJR4 http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/comment-page-1/#comment-7034 ChristianJR4 Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:52:56 +0000 http://christiannews.co.nz/2008/william-lane-craig-wins-on-points-and-substance/#comment-7034 "William Lane Craig wins on points and substance" Well isn't that a surprise!! NOT Perhaps Dr. Bill Cooke can make up for it in his debate on Thursday. As a philosopher who is familiar with Craig's arguments he should know better than to not engage with Craig's arguments. What a shame. “William Lane Craig wins on points and substance”

Well isn’t that a surprise!! NOT

Perhaps Dr. Bill Cooke can make up for it in his debate on Thursday. As a philosopher who is familiar with Craig’s arguments he should know better than to not engage with Craig’s arguments. What a shame.

]]>